This post is going to be short and simple. Why is it that when a conservative suggests health insurers take out Google ads to counter the blatant and obvious propoganda in Michael Moores latest lie fest - 'SiCKO', google gets attacked and has to take down the message but when Ron Paul, who has recieved too much support from the Liberal side to be considered conservative anymore, can go all the way to Google head offices and get away with it?
What is the big deal with Ron Paul anyway? Besides his cowardly anti-war stance he provides NOTHING that liberals like, in some ways he's so extreme it looks like he wants to bring back african slavery (when we should be focusing on Hispanic/Mexican slavery).
He said he does not support network neutrality, the concept
that telecommunications companies should be restricted from controlling
broadband access to the detriment of Web companies like Google, nor does he
support tech-friendly immigration reforms in Congress recently. And he doesn't
believe in federal student government loans, which a huge majority of the
audience, by a show of hands, had used to make it through college.
No comments:
Post a Comment